Ocean Blue Condo Project - Pattaya - Land has been sold

[travelerjim]

Ocean Blue Condo Project - Pattaya - Land has been sold

http://www.gaythailand.com/forums/index ... topic=2550

Gaybutton has posted this message on Gay Thailand...

"I received confirmed information today that the land on which the Ocean Blue Condos
was to be built has been sold and a deposit was paid yesterday.

My source tells me the buyer is a land speculator, not a builder, and is only
buying the land, but not the ongoing project.

It is my understanding that the Ocean Blue project will not go ahead.

That means those who have paid deposits for condos will need go to
the estate agents to confirm this and get their money back, if possible,
if there will be no condo construction after all."

--------------------------------------
http://www.sawatdee-gay-thailand.com/fo ... %20project


Hopefully those who did make a purchase deposit
will get their money refunded...???

Similar Threads:

• HAPPY NEW YEAR with the Pattaya Street Kids' Support Project
• Ocean 1 Tower given the clear - superstar condo for Jomtien
• Pattaya Street Kids Support Project ~ Purinut's Birthday
• Ocean One Tower : Announces price increase - over 100 Sold!
• The man behind Ocean 1 , world's tallest condo

[travelerjim]

Is this the 90+ storey Ocean One? Or something else?

Fattman..

This was the condo project on offer from Kevin Quill...
in South Pattaya ...Pratumnak Hill area.

NOT the Ocean One project.

DELETED

Interesting Jim. Lets see how the chosen agents will react now. One in particular who I can't name due to Gone Mads love affair with this particular agent.

For once I am intrigued - I can only recall mentioning two agents by name. The most recent one, who you alleged had a dislike of gays and to whom you referred as "an arsehole" (as distinct from your previous employer here, whom you described in the same manner) I made clear that I had little respect for professionally, stating why. The previous one was the author of the "advertorial" you published which I found disgraceful, following which your magazine lost close to 25% of its main advertisers.

I presume you are referring to the former; in either case you are wrong, as usual.