Do you guys always practice safe sex with money boys? If not what is it you get up to?
I always do anal with condoms but not with oral...and often (very) will come in the boys mouth or over his freshly fucked gaping hole
Get tested regularly (3 to 4 times a year) and to date am negative....which is not bad going considering the amount of high risk partners I've had.
As any Google search will tell you, oral sex is a low-risk transmission route for HIV. The greater risk of STDs comes from syphillis and the clap. However I never use condoms for oral sex and won't have sex a second time with someone who does. There was another thread some time ago about washing one's own hands after pissing; as I pointed out then I don't wash my cock neither do I expect do my partners in saunas back rooms or porn cinemas before we get down to business
Recent reseach I've come across (source I forget but respectable) has found that the use of a lubricant greatly INCREASES the risk of contracting hiv etc during unprotected intercourse.
I would have thought the opposite was true in that lubrication would minimise bleeding and tissue damage but it appears that this is not so.
Can anyone confirm these findings?
It is, of course, up to the customer if he chooses to risk infection by not using a condom during oral sex. However, it is our responsibility to ensure that our commercial partners do so.
I am amazed that educated falangs aren't aware that oral sex can transmit the hiv virus- and other stds- if only very rarely. I know one Thai guy who today is paying a heavy price for a mistake made eight or so years ago. He had the excuse of being young at the time; we haven't.
What a load of complete tosh, Oliver. We do not have a "duty of care" towards any consenting adult.Originally Posted by Oliver
An interesting view. Is this true for all our dealings with our fellow humans, or just commercial sex?
this applies if my commercial sex partner is a $US 1,000 a visit "escort" in New York?
or is it just the white man's burden in Thailand? where all falung here are so intelligent and have access to so much reliable information about risks during sex acts and are able to make "sensible" risk assessments? and all Thai sex workers are so ignorant and denied access to such information that they cannot make a reasonable informed personal decision? and if they do the risk assessment is obviously "wrong" anyway - at least from your perspective !
if a Thai sex worker makes an informed risk assessment about oral sex without a condom and it corresponds to a falung's risk assessment you think it is still that falung's "responsibility" to change the sex worker's mind - why?
if you really want to have an impact in Thailand try proselytizing on "safer driving" with helmets and seat belts if you feel such a strong "duty of care" towards consenting adults in areas other than commercial sex!
bkkguy
I can’t even be bothered to be apathetic these days!
This forum is for gay falangs in Thailand, many of whom participate in sex with Thais, not for drivers. And yes, I am in favour of compulsory helmets for motor-cy riders....if anyone is interested.
We are usually the buyers; the money boys usually need money much more than we do and sometimes, out of desperation consent to practices that they know are not safe. As far as oral sex, is concerned some are indeed ignorant. So yes, we do have responsibilities towards them.
Are you stupid? Of course safe sex.
Oral is fine. The chances of you getting HIV from oral sex is about zero, so wouldn't worry about it. You can get other neat things like HPV and what not though, but even that is still pretty unlikely.
As for anal, of course always safe. Although I don't have to worry about that, as I don't like anal -- either top or bottom. If I did though, it'd definitely be safe sex at all times when I'm screwing strangers.
Your attitude is the basis of the Nanny State, all the OH&S nonsense and safety labelling instructions we see around us these days
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote