Had I been attempting to write in German, I'd have hopefully used a capital F, but would almost certainly have made far worse errors elsewhere.
To face the flak is a fairly common term used in English.
As is to "blitz" something, e.g. bliz all the weeds in the garden with weedkiller.
To criticize this would be rather like me criticizing Germans for misusing English words adopted into German, such as "Handy" (mobile phone).
Considering that he is coming out of the trenches, flak is the perfect word.
The offers from the hotels seem reasonable to me. I do think that the insurance is wasted money because I assume we all have our own insurances and don't need anything extra.
Most of us seem to be waiting for some positive feedback from people who are or will be in Thailand. The problem is that it's a difficult time of year. Am I going to wait until December to decide if Thailand is a go or not? I opted to book one of the other 195 countries. it will be far easier to make a last-minute decision for a trip in April.
The hotel component of the charges does seem reasonable. I think the testing component is more expensive than it should be, but this really should not stop anyone going to Thailand.
Once out of quarantine, Bangkok hotels seem to be 500 a night below normal levels, so one can start "recovering" any extra expenditures.
If your own insurance explicitly includes covid treatment costs and at least $100,000 (now $50,000), it ought to satisfy Thai requirements. There are non-Thai insurance policies proven to meet the rules, so if you have one of those, I certainly agree that buying the Thai insurance would be a waste of money.
vnman (October 29th, 2021)