And that's bad?
Not without naming somewhere he didn't. Let him define what 'better' means to him and then tell us where that might be.
I have zero interest in that kind of nitpicking. If he can't figure out that I meant a general question, that's his problem. If there is somewhere any board members would rather go than Thailand, all I'm asking is where that would be and why.
If 'better' really has to be defined, then whoever posts about somewhere better is the one who tells us where and why it's better - which obviously would be his own definition of 'better'.