HOT Thai Guy Video Thread

[fountainhall]

Seeing as you seem to be very knowledgeable on these matters . . .

I have visited Japan regularly since 1981 and worked in Tokyo for a couple of years. That's the only reason I know something about the country.

As for pixilation, itтАЩs simply a matter of obeying the law! During the 20th century, censorship was always applied to naked images. Post World War II this took the form of blacking out genitalia and public hair. Eventually, producers of such materials got partly round the law by introducing pixilation which at least gives an idea of what is going on. Around the mid-1990s, the law changed and now only applies to genitals.

ItтАЩs all very typical of JapanтАЩs archly conservative society. A great deal is permissible provided it takes place behind closed doors. Indeed, much of this is more graphic than anything to be seen in Thailand. In public, though, the vast majority of Japanese conform strictly to societyтАЩs rules. Breaking those rules is a definite no-no. But a lot of producers now stretch the limits even further and the pixilation/masking is almost negligible. Some entrepreneurs invented anti-pixelation devices and they now do a roaring trade! Also, the internet makes it easier for some producers to get round the law and it is now possible to obtain vdos without any form of pixilation. But there are very few producers doing this, as far as I am aware.

[a447]

If the Japanese are so obsessed with pornography, why the hell do they pixilate the bits that most of us actually buy or view porn to see? I just donтАЩt get it.

As usual, Fountainhall is spot on.

The Japanese authorities have a very confused idea as to what constitutes porn. When American magazines starred posting photos of girls showing public hair they had an apoplectic fit and employed housewives to blacken out the hair with marker pens. It didn't take long for the locals to grab a bottle of nail polish remover and wipe the marker pen off, fully revealing the offending pubic hair. The authorities then handed the housewives, seconded in a warehouse in Yokohama, sharp needles which the used to scratch away the hair!

Local soft-porn, called "roman poruno" (romantic porn) did not allow pubic hair or genitals, but did allow cumshots and arseholes!!! The cock was pixelated but the cumshots was not. A guy could lick a girl's arsehole, totally unpixelated, but could not insert a finger.

The whole ban on pubic hair came to an end when local porn producers found a way around the law. The law stated that the girls could not be filmed or photographed naked from the waist down - they had to be wearing something, no matter how flimsy. So what did the producers do? They clothed the girls in fully transparent panties! They were so transparent that you had to look hard to even see them. With that, I think the authorities just gave up and pubic hair is now not a problem.

As Fountainhall wrote, the Japanese generally follow the law in public, but what happens behind closed doors is an entirely different matter - absolutely anything goes! They feel free to explore every imaginable fantasy.

There are all kinds if sex clubs in Japan, but usually they are not advertised, except in special magazines, and the clubs themselves are often not signposted. You have to be in the know.

Years ago a friend took me to a sm club - not my interest at all - but it was actually quite funny. Everything was simulated and totally fake; the "whipping" wouldn't hurt a fly and the 'chains" were made of plastic! But at least the customers could go away and tell their mates they'd been to an sm club.

The real hardcore clubs require expensive membership. That way, the owner knows who's coming to his club and the members form a group so they all know each other. Another example of Japanese doing things in groups.

Like Thailand,Japan is basically a very conservative Buddhist society - until you close the door and are able to shut yourself off from that society. Then the fun begins.

The Japanese law-makers represent mainstream Japan and so will not change the laws, as that would offend the conservative values, even though they are undoubtably patrons of the behind closed doors sex establishments.

Years ago my friends and I frequented strip shows, the raunchiest of which were held in venues out in the suburbs of Tokyo. Not because we wanted to see girls strip - God forbid- but because we got to see lots of cocks. The shows always featured a "namaita" show, where members of the audience (many if them hot university students - yum!) got up on stage and fucked the girls or got a handjob. Plus the finale usually featured a Japanese couple fucking acrobatically, or a rather tame foreign couple - usually rather embarrassed backpackers who were recruited off the streets. The Governor of Hiroshima and his guest, also a governor, were arrested at one of these shows mid-fuck! And his defence? It happened behind closed doors so was nobody else' s business.

[Jellybean]

Thank you for your detailed reply fountainhall.

My question was posted in haste, not always a good thing, so my apologies for not making my question more explicit. Of course I realised it was the law, but what I couldnтАЩt understand was how such an illiberal law could be juxtaposed with your earlier post, in which you said the Japanese porn industry is тАЬmassiveтАЭ and that a large proportion of its GDP is spent on porn. Why, I wondered, do the Japanese tolerate such a ridiculous restriction as pixilation?

It occurred to me that if the makers of un-pixilated porn DVDs were prosecuted, wouldnтАЩt Japanese juries simply refuse to convict given the huge public appetite and general acceptance of porn leaving the law unenforceable?

The UK was pretty late in liberalising the British publicтАЩs access to pornography. Although IтАЩm not quite sure if this was by way of statute, or simply a reluctant acceptance by the authorities. Did they simply judge that prosecutions under the 1959 Obscene Publications Act were unlikely to be successful as juries would refuse to convict due to a shift in public opinion? (Others with a greater knowledge on the law please feel free to correct me if my understanding is wrong.)

Now, having read your further reply and a447тАЩs comprehensive explanation I now feel I have a greater appreciation of this subject.

Thank you both for taking the time to post your replies. Oh, and apologies to netrix for going off topic.

[fountainhall]

It occurred to me that if the makers of un-pixilated porn DVDs were prosecuted, wouldnтАЩt Japanese juries simply refuse to convict given the huge public appetite and general acceptance of porn leaving the law unenforceable?

That is the western way if thinking. Japan is totally different. Japanese society works under rules which we would consider to be unbearably strict. Put simplistically, the individual and individual freedoms mean little. The larger group, be it your school, university, the company you work for, a community, district, city or the country will always take precedence. That is how Japanese are brought up from the moment they leave their mothers' womb. Porn exists and most Japanese are aware of this. Many will purchase porn. But because porn is a kind of forbidden fruit and disturbs the wheels of an ordered society, it therefore does not exist. The Japanese mind is quite capable of blocking out what it knows but feels it should not be seen to know! And so because porn therefore does not exist, producers will only push the envelope as far as they think they can, but they will not rock the boat by seeking to change the law. Besides, Japanese will always do their best to avoid having the law adjudicate in disputes. They will argue their case as vehemently as they decide permissible, but they will almost always prefer to come to an agreement by consensus.

Eventually, perhaps, by some kind of obscure osmosis parliament will change the law. But I suspect most MPs may have too many sexual skeletons in their cupboards to be seen to be supporting any change!

The UK was pretty late in liberalising the British publicтАЩs access to pornography . . . Did they simply judge that prosecutions under the 1959 Obscene Publications Act were unlikely to be successful as juries would refuse to convict due to a shift in public opinion?

Changes to the Obscene Publications Act in England and Wales in 1959 (Scotland and Northern Ireland have separate legal systems) came about not as a result of general public pressure but pressure from a small number of campaigning publishers and individuals. Whilst the Act brought about some major changes, it was not a license to print/publish pornography. It even kept a provision specifically prohibiting the publication of porn that would be considered obscene. The authorities still took action against several publishers, the latest successful prosecution being in 2010. I can recall outright porn being sold in backstreet shops in London in the 1970s. But Margaret Thatcher introduced legislation in the 1980s to make even this much more difficult. I'm not sure how easy or otherwise it is to purchase porn over the counter in Britain now. I suspect it is not nearly as easy as on the continent.

[a447]

Sorry we've gotten off track, Netrix, but your OP has lead to something very interesting.

In Japan, as soon as video stores started opening up they always kept porn under the counter so it was sort of freely available if you asked specifically for it.

Australia has very strange laws regarding porn. Whether or not you can buy porn movies in the sex shops depends on what state you live in. However, you can always order them by mail from Canberra. But, of course, these days everyone has the internet so porn is now available to all, so the laws are now irrelevant.

As Fountainhall points out, the Japanese have the uncanny ability to simply block out what they don't want to see/ think/ feel. So nobody "notices" all the guys sitting on the train reading porn manga (comics) with their very graphic content. I think in a western country somebody would surely say something if he saw a high school student looking at such magazines on public transport.

In Japan you are surrounded by sexual images from the time you are born. As a horny teenager I remember my mates and I walking past "roman poruno" theatres all over Tokyo, with their lurid posters on display for all to see. But the locals just walked nonchalantly past every day and didn't "notice" anything.

Japanese society works under rules which we would consider to be unbearably strict.

As I grew up there, I never felt that any of the rules - and there are a lot of them in daily life- to be strict in any way. It was the way things were and you just got on with things. On the contrary, I sometimes bemoan the seemingly lack if rules in western society; I believe that rules that everyone abides by leads to a safe, orderly society. In Japan, the good of society overrides the need for individual freedom - a bit like Singapore??

[christianpfc]

Can't access paperboy's (tube8) and netrix' (facebook) links.

Saw a video on facebook in a friend's room which I wanted to post here, but can't find it and don't know if it's blocked or removed or I have a wrong address.

Can anyone here open netrix' link?

Greg, I am not aware of bukkake shows anywhere in Bangkok.

[netrix]

christian, the facebook link was a video shot in a boy bar - asian but didn't look thai.
the link is dead now, probably due to FB terms. it wasn't mine but i downloaded it.

if you want to view it you can download it here .

[christianpfc]

What a surprise, that's exactly the video I wanted to share. Curious where it was shot, would like to attend.

There are a lot of pages that I can't access, on facebook (just error message) and gboysiam.com (blocked), and this started recently.