Is heavy handed moderation appropriate for this board?

[Nirish guy]

I was going to ask the very same question but was waiting to see if the definition of "temporarily suspended" meant hours, days, weeks or until whoever suspended him decided to try and undo that........either way as Smiles says it must have been something "shockingly bad" for the management to suspend such a long standing member.

And lets hope they don't make the mistake of "this can't won't be discussed as it's a moderation issue" as that would be a very foolish way to interact with existing members of course in relation to how they're treating other members, especially as moderation wise the board is running quieter and smoother than it has in several months so one would wonder why the "just leave things well enough alone" thought process wasn't used perhaps instead of Mods creating a problem where it "appears" there wasn't one in the first place ?

So Mods / Moses - anyone care to elaborate perhaps as maybe this was all your ( stupid) infarction robot and not a human being otherwise it appears to make little sense to the uninitiated and us great unwashed.

[Moses]

The difference btw "banned" and "temp.suspended" = "temp.suspended" will be switched to normal status when suspension time will finished (SG got 2 weeks of suspension). "Banned" means: member never will be switched to normal membership again, ban is permanent.

So Mods / Moses - anyone care to elaborate perhaps as maybe this was all your ( stupid) infarction robot and not a human being otherwise it appears to make little sense to the uninitiated and us great unwashed.

1. Mods don't report to members: they aren't appointed to moderators by election. They were appointed by me and report to me.
2. Words like "long standing member" and "5300 posts, 1866 likes ... sounds like a rather loyal member" have no sense when we are speaking about penalties: "long standing" and "newbies" should be treated equal.
3. No. It wasn't action of robot. It was me.