Liar Len addresses the crowd and informs them that after a brief chat with Moses he will remain as moderator. The crowd screams.
Liar Len addresses the crowd and informs them that after a brief chat with Moses he will remain as moderator. The crowd screams.
To friend and foe alike. Knock yourselves out.
you announce that as if anyone might be even remotely surprised.
Ok, instead of banging on the guy because you just don't like him personally, go ahead and list what he's done wrong during his actions as mod.
On that list of what he's done wrong, put every anti-SG posting he's made since he became moderator. A proper moderator would have recused himself from the fracas. But I suppose his interpretation of "moderator" is one which meets his own special needs.Originally Posted by cdnmatt
joe552 (December 4th, 2017)
where is the bashing your head against a brick wall emoji when you need it
and given that neither the moderator involved or the administrator seem even remotely interested in the concept of "proper" moderation, "recuse" and "fracas" are just further unnecessary words they are unlikely to want to add to their vocabularies
bkkguy
bobsaigon2 (December 4th, 2017), joe552 (December 4th, 2017)
Not sure if you were addressing that to me or to the board generally, but for the record I have never said such a thing about not liking Arsenal personally or otherwise. As to whether I think he's presented himself very well during his tenure that perhaps is another thing, but I've no intention of getting into that as he's stated quite clearly up to now that he could casre less of anyone's opinion so I'll not waste his time with that. My comment was merely saying exactly what it said i.e I doubt anyone would be remotely surprised at this annoucement.
Well I'm deeply shocked and surprised by this announcement. I just never saw it coming.
Hitchhiking's more of a challenge on the road less travelled.
Brad the Impala (December 5th, 2017), scottish-guy (December 5th, 2017)
Where would you like me to start?
With the lie that he would step down on 31/12?
With the lie that one of my posts was "untruthful" as an excuse to delete it?
With the lie that children must not be mentioned on the forum (surely you remember that one Matt!)?
With the lie I had posted Right Wing fascist propaganda pics when the pics I posted were of a demonstration in Barcelona which he had praised?
Or as Bob points out, should I start with his arrogant, offensive, insulting, and frankly racist posts?
joe552 (December 5th, 2017)
Of course Matt, the very worst lies would be ones where you'd have a demented Moderator and I'd be accused of saying things I never said, formally penalised for them, and then forbidden from mentioning them.
All hypothetically of course because such a thing could never happen, right - and even if it ever did you would not be allowed to mention it on pain of further sanctions
If you or anyone else would like to know more about hypothetical situations like this, just drop a PM and I'd be delighted to share some examples of the types of correspondence one could theoretically receive as a result of these hypothetical situations.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote