Sex drugs and Bitcoin

[frequent]

I want to know beyond reasonable doubt. That is the common standard I use.

As I've said before - this is a completely anonymous Forum for middle-aged men from First World countries to fantasise about travelling to a Third World country to spend time and money on male prostitutes young enough to be their grandchildren. There used to be a rule - perhaps there still is - that Forum members were not permitted to identify other members. Matt crossed that line by foolishly posting a photograph that purports to be of himself and his catamite. But for any of us to demand actual knowledge "beyond reasonable doubt" simply goes against the principles of the Forum since its inception almost twenty years ago

[cdnmatt]

Not to mention, do you realize how much of an idiot you're being? You're asking me to produce a one phrase setence in image format. If wanted, I could fire up GIMP right now, and quickly create an image for you.

Not to mention, how exactly do you expect me to find a phrase like that in a huge 63 page document? I have no idea what it even says, because I can't read it.

[cdnmatt]

Hang on a minute.

I'm not denying matt is real. I have never questioned his "actual existence", as you say. Obviously, someone is typing the comments and clicking on "submit." He is a real person. So Joe meeting him merely confirms what I already know.

What I, and many others, are questioning is whether or not he is really blind.

Also, I have just said that I am not asking for his medical records. I just want to see the words "optic nerve" or "5% vision". No need to post the contents of the CD - just a screenshot showing these few words.

Surely, if he can post a photo of himself on the net he should have no objections to posting a few words out of a document. His anonimity would in no way be compromised.

That hardly qualifies as a request for his medical records.

I want to know beyond reasonable doubt. That is the common standard I use.

As for the apology, both you and Matt seem to be having a go at me when I've already said very clearly in post #55.

Quit moving the goal post a447. Be careful, you're beginning to show your true colors again...

[Brad the Impala]

I'm not denying matt is real. I have never questioned his "actual existence", as you say

That's not correct. You have done exactly that quite recently.

I think "matt" has known for a long time that members no longer believe him. He is the creation of someone here - someone bored shitless and with too much time on his hands.

You don't think calling someone "the creation of someone here" is questioning his existence?

It's certainly true that around May, when surfcrest was starting different threads accusing me of God knows what, finally leading to his decision to ban of me, that he was supported by Brad the impala and Matt. They took turns posting the same shit, backed each other up, post after post, and threw "likes" at each other at every turn. It was hilarious.

No prizes for figuring out that we are not talking about 3 separate entities here.

So who are you accusing of not being a separate entity here and thereby questioning his "actual existence"?

[a447]

Matt wants an apology, so surely the onus is on him to demonstrate that I am mistaken.

I am not going to apologise simply because he wants me to.

If he is not after an apology, then I couldn't care less about any evidence.

[cdnmatt]

Matt wants an apology, so surely the onus is on him to demonstrate that I am mistaken.

I am not going to apologise simply because he wants me to.

If he is not after an apology, then I couldn't care less about any evidence.

Yes, I want you to own up to your actions, and be a man for probably the first time in your life.

Unfortunately, it looks as though you're not capable of doing that, which is of no real surprise...

[frequent]

If he is not after an apology, then I couldn't care less about any evidence.

Remind us, a447, you're the man who didn't know that Queen Elizabeth routinely sends Prince Andrew to represent her at Thai royal family events. I can well believe you "couldn't care less about any evidence" having personally experienced it

[scottish-guy]

A447, Youre one of the handful on here that I like and that's why this nonsense is so disappointing.

IF (and I don't know if this will even happen) Joe returns from his trip and posts a report featuring a pic of him, Matt, Leo, and assorted canines - are you seriously going to refuse to apologise because you haven't seen an extract of his medical records? Something you have absolutely no right to demand btw.

You say you are not questioning his actual existence because you know somebody is pressing a keyboard, but that is not what's meant and you know it. What is meant is Matt's persona, his lifestyle, his situation. If Joe confirms all that then surely you must accept it.

This is rather like when it was suggested that I post photographs of my trip to Thailand - which had to include a dated receipt, a thistle, and some other stuff. I did so in 2016, but still I have MiniMee posting garbage doubting variously whether I've ever been to Thailand or whether I've been in the last 5/10/15 yrs

Please don't turn into MiniMee Mark 2

[joe552]

Just to say, I don''t think meeting the dogs is in the plan which is basically, they will meet the bus and show me to the hotel. We'll meet for dinner and drinks of the 15th, and taken an all important photo. That's about it, as far as I'm concerned. I will only stay in KK for 2 rather than 3 nights, though.

I obviously mean Matt and Leo will meet the bus, not the dogs!

[scottish-guy]

If I can bring a thistle 6000 miles, you'd think Matt could bring the dogs to the feckin bus stop!