Goooooooooooooooooooood Mooooooooooooooooooorning SGT.

[arsenal]

Joe wrote.
"I know - she was incredibly selfish. But, in fairness, she did have dementia, so didn't know what she was doing, poor love."

That's what everyone who has sex with Scottish says about him.
😅

[Mickp]

I know - she was incredibly selfish. But, in fairness, she did have dementia, so didn't know what she was doing, poor love.

So u got the house? Should of bought it off your Mum cheaply before your sis gets half !!

[scottish-guy]

That's what everyone who has sex with Scottish says about him.
��

Eh?

[frequent]

I was talking to someone today about a mutual friend who had traveled back to his home country because one of his parents had died. Just before his return the other parent died. I remarked that he's saved himself an airfare, but I don't think my comment was taken that well. However it was certainly selfless of the second parent IMHO

[Mickp]

I was talking to someone today about a mutual friend who had traveled back to his home country because one of his parents had died. Just before his return the other parent died. I remarked that he's saved himself an airfare, but I don't think my comment was taken that well. However it was certainly selfless of the second parent IMHO

I hope u die soon u old fucker

[joe552]

So u got the house? Should of bought it off your Mum cheaply before your sis gets half !!

My family have always lived in rented accommodation.

[Mickp]

My family have always lived in rented accommodation.

Good to go for a holiday Joe but your circumstances wont change when u eventually come back, better to change your circumstances yourself and try to meet a guy in Dublin

[Moses]

I hope u die soon u old fucker

Please watch your tone. Next time such hating will cost you 2 weeks out of forum. (You don't have to answer: it is moderation note. Public discussion of such notes is against rules. )

[scottish-guy]

..Public discussion of such notes is against rules.. )

Discussion in public by whom? The Rule is unclear:


4.4 After the explanation has been published or sent by PM, all communication with the member(s) being sanctioned will be by PM or email. There will be no public discussion.

The implication is that the person to whom the "note" is addressed may not discuss it in public - but I'm getting the impression (perhaps wrongly) that you are seeking to prevent anybody discussing it in public, which would be rather autocratic.

So...which is it?

[Moses]

Discussion in public by whom? The Rule is unclear:


4.4 After the explanation has been published or sent by PM, all communication with the member(s) being sanctioned will be by PM or email. There will be no public discussion.

The implication is that the person to whom the "note" is addressed may not discuss it in public - but I'm getting the impression (perhaps wrongly) that you are seeking to prevent anybody discussing it in public, which would be rather autocratic.

So...which is it?

can you read that? member(s)

oh, forgot to mention: why you are talking about "autocratic"? it is private property, here is no place (space?) for "democracy" or "autocracy"