China's economic expansionism has already been discussed - and agreed - in this thread -
But my discussion was concerned exclusively with military expansionism, the direction this thread has taken for quite a few posts. I totally agree re China's global economic expansion. But you seem to assume that the reason for this economic expansion will lead to some form of military expansion or non-military take-over. I don't think any experts agree with that line at all. One of the most astute observers of China is the former two-time Prime Minster of Australia, Kevin Rudd, a fluent Mandarin speaker who is now President of the Asia Society Policy Institute in New York.
In one speech in 2012, he describes the views of various experts on the likely urbanised-related drivers of Chinese growth demand until 2025 (i.e. in 13 years from the date of the speech). Take a look at the following list. This is the primary reason why China has been snapping up access to raw materials all over the world - to ensure it can meet its own internal requirements - not to expand the borders of China into other territories and countries.
http://www.kevinruddmp.com/2012/08/s...rowth-and.html- 350 million more people to move to the cities,
- 221 Chinese cities of greater than a million people (compared with the 35 in all of Europe today),
- A million kilometres of new roads,
- 28,000 kilometres of new metro-rail,
- 170 mass transit systems (twice the number in all of Europe),
- 1.6 - 1.9 billion square metres of new floor space as part of 5 million new buildings,
- 50,000 new skyscrapers (the equivalent of 2 Chicagos per year),
- 97 new airports,
- And, to fuel the above, 1000 megawatts of additional coal fired generating capacity to be commissioned every week.
- Combined with the new wind power turbine being built every hour and a half