Quote Originally Posted by scottish-guy

1) Being "esteemed" by the SGT membership and being "warm-hearted"
2) Not having "ever been involved in a disagreement with anyone here"
If I were in charge of selecting moderator assistants.... Number 1 would be a requirement. But number 2 would prove that they would *not* be up for the job.

A moderator who "never gets involved in a disagreement"... Is like a policeman with a serious phobia of guns. Silly. Very silly.

Getting involved with disagreements.... pretty much is the *description* of the job.