A447...I hope it wasn't in reaction to the pic I posted of the two naked old guys😎
Printable View
A447...I hope it wasn't in reaction to the pic I posted of the two naked old guys😎
MFAS, that selfie of yourself and a447 in the throes of love, were just a bit too graphic.
When I first saw that series (yes *series*) of pics maybe 10yrs ago, there was actually *three* old guys.
Maybe one of them expired during the photoshoot, but for anybody who might be interested (necrophiliacs maybe) the series is called LEMONPARTY - and I'm sure the rest of the pics are still out there
No comment - because comment is superfluous. Do you MFAS ever wonder why gaythailand is gaining a considerable number of new posters and this site is losing them - at some rate it seems. It's because of posters like you who are here simply to take the piss and make utterly stupid, fatuous one-line comments you think are funny but are in fact crashingly boring.
Have you ever started a thread that was constructive, interesting and worthy of discussion? I doubt it. The only post you've started that I recall is about a French restaurant run by one of the biggest homophobes in Bangkok.
Enjoy your dining. Enjoy this forum. As I've said, thanks in part to you others are leaving.
Actually F.H. I thought it was you who aided A447's departure....And by all means lets keep posting the same oh so boring posts that will insure the growth of membership and keep existing members here!
a447s reasons for leaving (temporarily suspending I hope) are exactly as he has stated. So no one need blame anyone else.
Why on earth would you think I was referring to a447? Because you just don't think? For your information, I wasn't.
And I agree oh so much about all those oh so boring posts. So best that you give up posting! :yahoo_mini: I'm still waiting to find out any post you have made that was actually constructive, interesting and worthy of discussion.
Lol,
And that illustrates precisely your level of childish communication.
You can send me all the pics that you want, It will not change my mind!
MFAS and Fountainhall. Compared to some of the ding dongs we've had here you twos' is rather boring. Could you both sharpen up your act. Thank you.
You call that quietly? There is no disagreement a447. You think your status here deserves you the right for rules to be created just for you.
I'm not here to fight your battles or muzzle other members for you or for anyone else here. If you think that's your privilege, then I guess we do disagree.
Surfcrest
How would you suggest I leave "quietly?". Start a new thread, perhaps?
All I said was:
A). We had a disagreement (i.e. we didn't agree!)
B). I'm going elsewhere
Just those two simple points. Read my post again. I would think that would qualify as leaving "quietly."
I did not mention "status", "rules" being "created", "muzzling" members or 'privileges". You did.
Your dishonesty in your post above is breathtaking.As an example, what rule did I ask you to create??
Suggest v a447 is already more interesting than MFAS v Fountainhall. And it's only been going for three posts.
Isn't there an "ignore" function?
:confused:
a447 is leaving?!?!?!? Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.....
Well, come on Surfcrest. You made some scurrilous accusations above. Where's the evidence??
Can't tell us what rule I allegedly wanted you to create? Too hard, was it?
Ok. Let's move onto another one, shall we?
You mentioned "privilege" although you didn't include a verb so it's difficult to see what you are getting at. Did you mean I asked for some kind of privileged treatment? Is that what you meant?
Put up or shut up Surfcrest. Post the evidence.
One you've done that, I'll then ask you where I asked you to fight my battles for me.
Surfcrest, you have gone out of your way here to blacken my name. You know full well that I never asked for any of those things. Never.
You've now painted yourself into a corner. You've only succeeded in exposing the fact that you have blatantly lied to the members.
I never realised it at the time but Kommie's scathing criticism of you in various posts over the years was spot on. It even tallies with Neal's description of you, before he lost the plot.
Your post above demonstrates that you are indeed a despicable, dishonest and dishonourable person.
I've got more to say. I've only just started.
Well I have to stick my oar in here - irrespective of your disagreement with Surfcrest, I have to suggest that Neal never fully HAD the plot.
If you recall when he first appeared on this board he had at least 3 different handles and soon was even posting as a customer saying how good his bar was.
He started off unbalanced and ended up psychotic
I do hope AK47 rethinks his decission, as I enjoyed his input on many topics even though he is best kown for the balls on his face trip reports!
As does MFAS with his reviews (word for word) of restaurants run by virulent homophobic old Frenchmen :yahoo_mini:
In fact, exclusively in chat forums seems like it has disappeared with the popularity of the go-go bars.
On the question of sharpening up acts, I agree. Let's do that arsenal. I'd appreciate your comments. The point at issue here is how to encourage new posters and not having existing posters leave.
How about we look at some facts?
In the 12 months from mid-March 2015 to 2016, MFAS started 54 threads in this forum. In the 12 months from mid-March 2016 to 2017 he has started all of 4 - and the first post in one thread consisted of merely three words.
So let's look where else he posts. From 12 August last year he has been a member of gaybuttonthai posting, as he has written, under the name "undaunted". What about his posting history there? In those 7 months he has started 89 threads! Many of his posts there are long paragraphs. Here they are generally one-liners.
So gaybuttonthai - 89 in JUST SEVEN MONTHS. Sawatdeenetwork - 4 in A FULL 12 MONTHS. Oh, and 1 of those 4 posts was a word for word copy of a post in gaybuttonthai!
Does anyone now have any doubts as to where MFAS' loyalties lie? And why his constant one-line carping, put-downs and negative criticisms are consigned to this forum?
Fountainhall: Undaunted has been a member of GB for many years, at least since 2010. You'll find he didn't post anywhere for a long period of time but upon his return he continued to enjoy way more leeway than say Thaifarang who was banned this morning for being very naughty. Haha. You're welcome here Thaifarang, we like naughtiness even though we pretend we don't. Now "loyalties'...it's a message board, not a war so that's an over dramatic word to use I think. Basically I'm enjoying the current spats enormously so can I say to Surfcrest, a447, MFAS and your good self. Guys...knock yourselves out.
You asked me to muzzle Frequent, a member you allege to be Kommentariat. You didn't appreciate Frequent's reference to some posts Kommentariat wrote long ago. You began your request by quoting the number of posts you've made and how many years you've been a member.This sounds like privilege you're sliding across the table at me.
http://sawatdeenetwork.com/v4/showth...l=1#post214722
The following link directs you to our Rules & Guidelines.
http://sawatdeenetwork.com/v4/showth...amp-GUIDELINES
If you'd like a Rule changed, ask the Membership, not me! I only pay the bills and absorb the abuse.
Surfcrest
.
Your comments re appreciated. But why does it clearly state on the gaybuttonthai board that undaunted's date of joining was "Fri. Aug 12, 2016 8:47 am"?
Now he may have decided to cease membership and rejoin. I have no problem whatever with that. But you have actually failed to respond to my specific points.
The facts remain as I stated. MFAS's loyalty is clearly with gaybuttonthai to which he contributes many positive (and perhaps not so positive - I just don't to know) posts. Since joining gaybuttonthai, he has hardly posted here - and what he posts are one-line put downs, carping and negative criticism. Odd that in a thread dealing with the fact that some posters have been driven away and new posters are not joining, MFAS posts comments that are seemingly calculated to drive posters away. You did not answer!
And did I actually say "war"? If so I can't find it.
As for Thaifarang, you really can't be very observant. It's perfectly clear he has been posting here and on gaythailand for some time using different handles in each forum! Same basic questions, same writing style - very obvious.
Thanks Sherlock,
Fountainhall:
1. I don't have to respond to any particular points. I'm not the one winding himself up like a hungry boa constrictor.
2. I don't read gaythailand, just this one and GB.
3. Many of MFAS posts on GB are specifically designed to poke certain individuals (barmy army, the cheap meat loaf crowd, balloon chasers, the Sunee set etc.) So, in that respect it's obviously going to be more effective to do it on GB than here because that's where they live.
Still enjoying both ding dongs fellas. Carry on Haha. :clapping:
How rude! Haven't you heard Climate change doen't exist? Actually I don' t wish to drive anyone anywhere, and I don' t believe members should obsess over other members and new members motives...handles...etc. and should only worry about reading and posting!!!
Surf, I will also add to my previous post that a member who is always caught up in the drama of consiracy theories and constant complaints of other members does nothing to foster growth or the maintainance of the current membership.
A typical non-response answer which will no doubt be followed by a typically meaningless photograph. Nothing you contribute here is constructive - yet it is over on gaybuttonthai. That is clearly where your loyalties lie - as I have proved conclusively - even though arsenal will not confirm it. Your posts here are basically destructive in nature - clearly something you enjoy. It is damaging to the forum.
Really? Are you sure?
Here's the pm in question, in full:
I asked you to "muzzle Frequent" did I? That's strange; I can't find any reference to any such request. Please feel free to point it out. All I can see is that I asked you to "enforce the rule."Quote:
Kommie's link to bogus trip rrport
I refer to Kommie's post #73 in the thread 'Where is Everyone?"
I was under the impression that, after much discussion on a thread started by me and devoted to Kommie's bogus trip report -"Is blatant deception ok?" - a decision was made that the original post would remain but there was to be no link to it in the future.
You posted:
"I will add a Rule that no member can talk about the individual behind a handle, about anything they do outside of this Board without their specific permission or unless that person has mentioned whatever it is that they have done, here on this Board already. "
I thought Kommie had moved on, but he is re-opening old wounds, apparently in breach of the new rule.
Surfcrest, I've had enough. I won't put up with it any longer.
Please enforce the rule or publicly stage on the forum that the rule no longer applies.
A447
(And while you're at it, point out where I began my request by mentioning the number of posts.)
So Surfcrest, who is telling the truth? Eh? You or me?
But let's pretend for a minute that I did ask you to "muzzle" him.
Tell me, have you ever mentioned anything about deleting Kommie? (And please do not insult the members' intelligence by suggesting Kommie and Frequent are different people). If you have, then you're worse than me! I apparently only asked you to "muzzle" him m whereas you spoke about deleting him.
I've got more to say. If you want to keep this up, bring it on!
Surfcrest, you have not been truthful. You have gone out of your way to paint a completely false picture of me. I'm at a loss as to why you would do that, especially as we have not clashed in the past. Was it because I mentioned gaythailand 's success in attracting nrw members?
Surf, just imagine if you were a visitor looking at this last page in its entirety do you think you would want to become a member?
A visitor would not have to continue on until this last page. The answer can be found on page one.
And in your constant negativity, mfas.
What a lot of fuss about nothing. If A447 thinks having a disagreement with the owner is a reason to stop posting, so be it but I dare him to publicly attack the owner on one of the other forums. At least here it was aired openly. Sadly A447 lost all crediblity with me when he used Neal to back up his disagreement with Surcreft.