British Royal targetted by blackmailers

News reports emerging of a sex and drugs scandal for one of the Royals. Last time one of them had sex with an aide it was Charles - who is it this time?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7065942.stm

News reports emerging of a sex and drugs scandal for one of the Royals. Last time one of them had sex with an aide it was Charles - who is it this time?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7065942.stm

Harry, I hope. He's swell.


http://www.dlisted.com/files/harryvodka1.jpg

[Lunchtime O'Booze]

he's out in the open with his antics..(shouldn't he be placed on a register for nipple sucking ?)

I once had a friend who was in the Irish Guards but also equerry to a Royal ( one killed by the IRA).

He was drummed out of the guards when caught coming out of another's room late at night..his main crime..it was the Commander's favourite guard he foolishly went with.

Rumours are circulating that one member of the Royal Family (Windsor) is a male model.

Rumours are circulating that one member of the Royal Family (Windsor) is a male model.A couple of months ago there were rumours circulating that a member of the Thai Royal Family had died from AIDS in Germany. And we know the value of that rumour

[cottmann]

News reports emerging of a sex and drugs scandal for one of the Royals. Last time one of them had sex with an aide it was Charles - who is it this time?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7065942.stm

According to some online reports, it is Princess Margaret's son, Viscount Linley, with the tape "allegedly showing a royal aide talking of gay sex with him. The aide is also allegedly seen on a video tape taking cocaine from an envelope embossed with Linley's name." Others say it is Lord Frederick Windsor, son of Prince and Princess Michael of Kent. He is said to have admitted to cocaine abuse in the past, 1999, and also to be openly homosexual, as well as a board member of the gay social club Sweet Suite, in Soho.

[Marsilius]

According to the original press story, the act in question (receiving a blowjob) occurred at the royal personage's own stag night.

That would rule out the unmarried Frederick but still leave Linley as a candidate in the frame.

the act in question (receiving a blowjob) occurred at the royal personage's own stag night.One has to ask what else stag nights are for? And I wonder what's the most shocking element - the sex, the drugs, or the fact there's a queen in the family?

it has been reported in NZ papers it was Viscount Linley, now, I haven't read or seen the newspaper as I'm in the UK, but that is what they are saying on gaydar.

it has been reported in NZ papers it was Viscount Linley, now, I haven't read or seen the newspaper as I'm in the UK, but that is what they are saying on gaydar.And in America too - and since it's America doubtless sometime soon we'll hear that David Linley is a "sex addict" - http://www.sawatdee-gay-thailand.com/fo ... 13203.html (http://www.sawatdee-gay-thailand.com/forum/bill-clitoris-only-in-america-t13203.html)

[Sen Yai]

it has been reported in NZ papers it was Viscount Linley, now, I haven't read or seen the newspaper as I'm in the UK, but that is what they are saying on gaydar.

Well, I'm not in New Zealand either, but using the power of the interntet I am able to read what they are reporting there!

It is true that the NZ Herald (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/2/story.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10473131) has fingered Viscount Linley!

[krobbie]

The whole sordid event was rehashed on the television in New Zealand tonight.

The blow job was disguised as oral sex, but they said that the person in question could not be named in the UK press due to a GAG order. I laughed so hard I nearly pee'd myself.

Of course, we still have the death penalty for acts of treason. I feel a beheading is in order.

[cottmann]

Of course, we still have the death penalty for acts of treason. I feel a beheading is in order.

There has been no death penalty for treason (or piracy) in the UK since July 31 1998, when the Criminal Justice Bill of that year removed High Treason and piracy with violence as capital crimes, thus effectively ending capital punishment. On 27 January 1999, when the-then Home Secretary (Jack Straw) formally signed the Sixth Protocol of the European Convention of Human Rights in Strasbourg, on behalf of the British government and formally abolished the death penalty in the UK.

[Marsilius]

Not quite right!

Ratification of the SIXTH Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights prohibited capital punishment with the exception of "in time of war or imminent threat of war."

It was only with the UK signing up to the THIRTEENTH Protocol (10 October 2003) that the death penalty was banned from the UK under all circumstances.

And about time, too!

[cottmann]

Not quite right!
Ratification of the SIXTH Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights prohibited capital punishment with the exception of "in time of war or imminent threat of war."
It was only with the UK signing up to the THIRTEENTH Protocol (10 October 2003) that the death penalty was banned from the UK under all circumstances.
And about time, too!

True, but at the time that the UK signed up to the 13th Protocol, there was no situation in which the death penalty could be applied in the UK anyway, as the last remaining provisions for the death penalty under military jurisdiction (including in wartime) were removed when the Human Rights Act 1998 came into force on 9 November 1998.