travelerjim
September 5th, 2007, 15:43
The VT7 project in Pattaya ...is now halted by court orders...or it seems,
maybe others have seen some activity at the construction site ???
I checked the StopVT7 website and they have posted this aerial map of the 100 and 200 meter lines...
interesting...
No doubt - the decision is still out on whose thinking (or money) will survive the crisis for View Talay 7.
http://stopvt7.blogspot.com/
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y64/travelerjim/StopVT7.jpg
"The court is going to order the Thai Port Authority and the Bangkok Department of Civil Engineering
and City Planning to take measurement and make a map for the court.
The map will show where VT7 building is located as to issue 9 alignment.
The stopvt7 group is going to hire an expert to watch over the taking of measurement and making of the map.
VT7 can keep working but not build over 14 meters high.
Their will be another court hearing.
The Bangkok letter form Department of Civil Engineering and City Planning explains the following?
1. The distance of 100 meters in Issue 8 and the distance of 200 meters Issue 9 are not the same alignment.
2. Issue 9 specified that the measurement of the alignment of the cost line be taken only at MSL (mean sea level).
This setting 200 meters measured from MSL for alignment of alignment before you can build over 14 meters.
3. City Hall and VT7 as made false claims in court by claim Issue 8 and Issue 9 as the same alignment before you can build over 14.
Quote from Mr. Surapol 19 of June 2007 Department of Civil Engineering and City Planning Bangkok letter:
тАЬThe distance of 100 m as per point 3 of the Ministerial Regulation Issue 8 (B.E. 2519) issued pursuant to the
Building Control Act B. E. 2479 and the distance of 200 m. as per point 3 of the Ministerial Regulation Issue 9 (B.E. 2521)
issued pursuant to the Building Control Act B. E. 2479 are not the same alignment.
In that the alignment of the coat line in accordance with the Ministerial Regulation Issue 8 (b. E. 2519) had not specified
the measurement be taken at MSL. But in accordance with the Ministerial Regulations Issue 9 (B. E. 2521) it specified
the measurement of the alignment of the coast line be taken only at MSL.тАЭ
Chief Engineer Acting on Behalf of the Director General
Department of Civil Engineering and City Planning"
--------------------------
and so goes the arguments for and against....
TravelerJim
maybe others have seen some activity at the construction site ???
I checked the StopVT7 website and they have posted this aerial map of the 100 and 200 meter lines...
interesting...
No doubt - the decision is still out on whose thinking (or money) will survive the crisis for View Talay 7.
http://stopvt7.blogspot.com/
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y64/travelerjim/StopVT7.jpg
"The court is going to order the Thai Port Authority and the Bangkok Department of Civil Engineering
and City Planning to take measurement and make a map for the court.
The map will show where VT7 building is located as to issue 9 alignment.
The stopvt7 group is going to hire an expert to watch over the taking of measurement and making of the map.
VT7 can keep working but not build over 14 meters high.
Their will be another court hearing.
The Bangkok letter form Department of Civil Engineering and City Planning explains the following?
1. The distance of 100 meters in Issue 8 and the distance of 200 meters Issue 9 are not the same alignment.
2. Issue 9 specified that the measurement of the alignment of the cost line be taken only at MSL (mean sea level).
This setting 200 meters measured from MSL for alignment of alignment before you can build over 14 meters.
3. City Hall and VT7 as made false claims in court by claim Issue 8 and Issue 9 as the same alignment before you can build over 14.
Quote from Mr. Surapol 19 of June 2007 Department of Civil Engineering and City Planning Bangkok letter:
тАЬThe distance of 100 m as per point 3 of the Ministerial Regulation Issue 8 (B.E. 2519) issued pursuant to the
Building Control Act B. E. 2479 and the distance of 200 m. as per point 3 of the Ministerial Regulation Issue 9 (B.E. 2521)
issued pursuant to the Building Control Act B. E. 2479 are not the same alignment.
In that the alignment of the coat line in accordance with the Ministerial Regulation Issue 8 (b. E. 2519) had not specified
the measurement be taken at MSL. But in accordance with the Ministerial Regulations Issue 9 (B. E. 2521) it specified
the measurement of the alignment of the coast line be taken only at MSL.тАЭ
Chief Engineer Acting on Behalf of the Director General
Department of Civil Engineering and City Planning"
--------------------------
and so goes the arguments for and against....
TravelerJim