PDA

View Full Version : Vast ancient settlement found at Angkor Wat



August 14th, 2007, 04:18
The Angkhor Wat, spread over 1200 sq km, (NYC = 800 sq km) encompasses some 300 temples of varying styles and sizes. It is the largest archaeological site in the world and the scene of one of the most intensive restoration efforts.

It was built by King Suryavarman II between 1113 and 1150 AD and is seen as a masterpiece of Khmer architecture.

Please read more: (22:00 13 August 2007; NewScientist.com news service; Emma Young, Sydney

Vast ancient settlement found at Angkor Wat

The new map of Angkor Wat combines data from ground-sensing radar with aerial photographs and extensive fieldwork (Image: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

A huge urban sprawl once surrounded Cambodia’s famous Angkor Wat temple, according to a newly created map. The scale of the settlement makes it more plausible that the inhabitants of Angkor brought on their own society's collapse through environmental degradation.

The new map uses data from high-resolution, ground-sensing radar and aerial photographs to augment extensive fieldwork. By detecting slight variations in vegetation and ground moisture due to underlying ruins, the radar reveals in unprecedented detail the location of temples - including 94 newly identified temple sites plus another 74 that have yet to be checked on the ground - ponds, roads and canals.

Researchers in the Greater Angkor Project at the University of Sydney in Australia, together with colleagues in Australia, Cambodia and France, used the techniques to survey the entire watershed of the Angkor region.

The area covers nearly 3000 square kilometres, most of which is now blanketed with dense vegetation. Earlier maps suffered from problems with the resolution of aerial photographs and radar data, and from difficulties with accessing remote regions.
Urban sprawl

The researchers found that about two thirds of this region was once occupied, making it by far the biggest pre-industrial settlement yet documented. The main urban district of about 1000 square kilometres was surrounded by suburbs that seem to spread far beyond the north-western and south-eastern borders of the study site.

In fact, says Damian Evans of the University of Sydney, “there is just no obvious boundary” for the settlement. The population of the area was probably around half a million, he adds, though earlier estimates of a million inhabitants - suggested in the 1970s - could still be correct.

Such extensive settlement may help explain why Angkor, which thrived between the 9th and 16th centuries, had been overwhelmed by vegetation by the time European explorers first encountered the site in the 1860s.

The main theory for Angkor’s abandonment is that the creation of an extensive water management system caused environmental damage that ultimately led to the failure of the system, leading to food shortages. That scenario now seems even more likely.
Canal system

“This new map lays out definitively what the system would have looked like - and shows that it was capable of significantly impacting on the local environment,” says Evans.

Local people cleared land, creating a complex system to move water from a region of high ground spanning about 500 square kilometres to storage reservoirs in the centre, and on, via canals, to irrigate about another 500 square kilometres of land to the south. This system would have allowed the society to produce surplus rice to feed workers engaged in building monuments such as Angkor Wat.

The new map also reveals apparent failures of the canal system, with multiple dykes at certain sites. “There is massive redundancy in the canal network - and that gives us an indication that things were going wrong,” says Evans.

Researchers have not yet dated these sites to confirm that they coincide with Angkor’s collapse, however. Nor is it clear what exactly might have gone wrong. “We have evidence of a huge water-management system that had the capacity to impact significantly on the environment," says Evans. "But at the moment, the actual evidence that it did so is pretty thin on the ground.”

Journal reference: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702525104)

Source: www.newscientist.com/article/dn12474-va ... r-wat.html (http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12474-vast-ancient-settlement-found-at-angkor-wat.html)

August 14th, 2007, 06:33
This information seems familiar. I think this study has been floating around for at least a year. It is an excellent one though and shows what is only now becoming avaliable to archeologists with new technologies like GPS and satellite mapping.

Unfortunately it seems current affairs are coloring all our interpretations of the past. It looks like every civilization "collapse" is now being blamed on our new bugaboo "environmental degradation". Its kind of silly in this case since we DO have historical records which tell what happened to Ankgor. The Siamese invaded and destroyed it - much like Ayuthaya being destroyed later by the Burmese. It was "abandoned" because the capital was moved to Phnom Penh, thought to be safer from Siamese invasion than the old capital.

We in the West don't seem to grasp that idea. We cling to our old sites like Rome or Athens or Jerusalem as if our entire way of life depended on it. SE Asia is littered with old abandoned capitals - Sukhothai, Pagan, Awa, Ayuttaya, Lopburi, My Son etc.
If it wasn't for the French Vientianne might have gone the same way after the resurgent Thais, from their new capital Bangkok, destroyed it in the 1820's.

August 14th, 2007, 10:15
Hi,

Let's hope they can get in there and protect the site and its archaelogical artifacts and points of interest etc before the looters arrive with their machetes to steal everything and anything that they are capable of.


Towns and cities can be nicked by some in this part of the world never mind the buddha images and statues!

August 14th, 2007, 10:34
This information seems familiarYes, it's not "news" but nonetheless interesting if you like old ruins (and many Thai boys do)

August 14th, 2007, 10:40
Hi ttom,

Good topic, but doubt if the Grand Poobah allows it to remain here!

elephantspike
August 14th, 2007, 12:37
Hey, if it goes into Any Other Country, it is still "here".

I have instructed jinks to leave it filed under "Gay Thailand" anyway.

That seems somehow important to some of you.

August 14th, 2007, 15:46
One understands that the Khmer enslaved thousands of Thai in the development of Angkor, so unless ES is going to open a kinky section then there is certainly a relevance to "Gay Thailand". :bom:

August 15th, 2007, 00:24
Hey, if it goes into Any Other Country, it is still "here".

I have instructed jinks to leave it filed under "Gay Thailand" anyway.

That seems somehow important to some of you.

Thank you. ..

I trust that this topic will be of interest for a long time. Ankhor Wat already changed tourism Asian

I hope this will have as side effect the long needed impact for the beautiful historical Khmer sides in Buri Ram, Si Sakhet and Surin. This parts of Thailand are really beautiful. All you need is time, patience and senses for the spectacular beauty of rural Thailand. With unhandsome companion and a good book you cannot be that wrong.

August 15th, 2007, 00:33
With unhandsome companion and a good book you cannot be that wrong.An unhandsome companion?! Why would you bother?

August 15th, 2007, 01:24
An handsome companion might distract you from the book and the stones.

Smiles
August 15th, 2007, 03:47
" ... I hope this will have as side effect the long needed impact for the beautiful historical Khmer sides in Buri Ram, Si Sakhet and Surin. This parts of Thailand are really beautiful. All you need is time, patience and senses for the spectacular beauty of rural Thailand. With unhandsome companion and a good book you cannot be that wrong ... "
Agree very much that the Khymer (and Hindu) influenced architecture at Isaan sites such as Prasat Phanom Rung, Phra Whihan, Prasat Muang Tam and Phi Mai should be preserved ~ and gently restored ~ with rigour and visited without question.

Of the four mentioned, Phra Whihan is in the worst condition . . . the other three are rather impressive in the care taken care of them. I assume Whihan loses because of it's position, straddling the Thai/Cambodian border as it does. In fact, the main temple area is fully within Cambodia and probably loses out greatly in comparison to the much larger and better known Angkor Wat in receiving funding from a very poor country.

One point about visiting these sites: try your best to go in rainy season, or at least during the wetter months when it's green and lush and much more beautiful. During the December-April dry season the Isaan countryside goes more to brown and dusty red, and it's far less pleasant trudging up and down and through those rocky and hillside temples.

Cheers ...

Lunchtime O'Booze
August 15th, 2007, 10:49
reading the title : "Vast ancient settlement found at Angkor Wat "

I thought someone had finally located The Colonel who mysteriously vanished from this forum.