PDA

View Full Version : The infamous ShamlessMack body type rating



topjohn5
September 20th, 2014, 00:28
For all of you who either want a good laugh or for you truly anal types here is the old ShamlessMack body type rating including the pictures. I wish I had the hair rating scale but alas I do not and cannot find.

http://66.199.190.19/~sgt/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=20522&view=previous

Surfcrest
September 20th, 2014, 02:44
It's also still here, in the archives of this current version of our Board :-B

http://sawatdeenetwork.com/forum/post218094.html?hilit=Simon%20Wiesenthal#p218094

....a great find topjohn5, thanks for that!

Surfcrest

fedssocr
September 20th, 2014, 10:36
I still miss his blog and reviews.

neddy3
September 21st, 2014, 10:21
I still miss his blog and reviews.

Yes, indeed. It was always an entertaining and informative read. ;)

Strange that his sudden 'disappearance' was never explained.

christianpfc
September 21st, 2014, 22:21
Thank you very much. I recently did a search on google, without finding what I was looking for.

It was just when I developed similar tendencies to categorize (see my tattoo count posts from some years ago), that his blog went offline. I was only weeks or months away from printing it out and studying it in details and using it for my purposes.

I once read somewhere: posting something on the internet is like throwing a piece of wood into the ocean. You don't know where it is, you can't retrieve it, but it's still there and someday someone will find it.

(Unfortunately, shamelessmack is not saved on archive.org, which was useful for me many times to get parts of websites that are no more. I know only two websites that are not covered by archive.org, someone disabled this in robots.txt file)

I use the following system to process stats on online dating sites:
height in cm - weight in kg = 25 skinny close to malnourished, 20 perfect, 15 depends, 10 too fat (by my standards, might still be acceptable for others), easier than BMI (body mass index).

billyhouston
September 22nd, 2014, 04:01
Christian, unless I'm misreading it, I think you might have misquoted your 'system'.

"height in cm - weight in kg = 25 skinny close to malnourished", so a guy weighing 55kg would be skinny if his height were 80cm.... etc.

christianpfc
September 22nd, 2014, 11:17
I forgot to subtract 100:
height-100-weight = 20 is optimum
180 cm and 55 kg might be too skinny, but 180 cm and 60 kg is perfect.