The Sun pays damages over false child sex offence claim

I don't intend to make any replies to this post, but after some of the comments I have had to endure here since my
incarceration in 2009, I am extremely pleased to finally be able to provide the following link.

My thanks to those here that have given me your continued support.

Cheers,


George.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/no ... -sex-claim (http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/nov/11/sun-damages-false-child-sex-claim)

[Neal]

Congragulations George and now I hope some of our posters understand why we must take a hard stand on accusations that are thrown around carelessly with nothing other than rumour.
DaBoss

[jinks]

Nice one mate, I take it that you can you afford music lessons now.

[Brisboy82]

That's great news and an important reminder of the importance of the principle of innocent until proven guilty. The hysteria that goes on in Western Society these days does hurt some innocent people in very serious ways.

[jinks]

Hey George, I see that you are now a liverpudlian. (if that's how you spell it)

Liverpool Echo Newspaper 12 Nov 2011 (http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2011/11/12/the-sun-newspaper-fined-after-wrongly-calling-liverpool-musician-a-paedophile-100252-29762307/)

[Khor tose]

Hey George, I see that you are now a liverpudlian. (if that's how you spell it)

Liverpool Echo Newspaper 12 Nov 2011 (http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2011/11/12/the-sun-newspaper-fined-after-wrongly-calling-liverpool-musician-a-paedophile-100252-29762307/)

Yes, the secret is out, George is the long lost fifth Beatle.

[krobbie]

Bloody wonderful. Vindicated and with remuneration.

It is amazing how quick people were to throw the shit and how slow they are to apologise for it. I wouldn't be holding my breath on that eh George?

Cheers G,
Krobbie

[...George is the long lost fifth Beatle.

Either that or Ken Dodd's long lost twin.

:leb:

[Brad the Impala]

I don't intend to make any replies to this post, but after some of the comments I have had to endure here since my
incarceration in 2009


Bloody wonderful. Vindicated and with remuneration.

It is amazing how quick people were to throw the shit and how slow they are to apologise for it.

Not completely vindicated, surely just not proven, and as for the comments that George has had to "endure", I don't recall many if any unfair ones, and many supportive posts. It seems that a number of those posters who have now applauded George's "innocence" in a Thai Court are the same people who questioned the probity of Thai Courts in other high profile cases in the past, suggesting that money may have been an influencing factor in those verdicts.

As for George's probity, apart from the fact that he was previously forced to admit on this forum that he had employed underage staff in his own bar, it was also he who said about the man recently convicted in NZ of arranging a sex tour, in which he agreed to help provide 'too young' year old sex partners

...surely just not proven....

What a loathesome creature you are.

I don't know George, I've never met or spoken to George, so I have no vested interest one way or another.

The fact of the matter is that he was found NOT GUILTY, after a very lengthy trial without a jury.

So unless you know something that the Thai Police and the Thai Courts don't know, then I suggest you shut your hole.

You are the sort of person that would have hammered the last nail into Jesus Christ , whilst declaring "..there's no smoke without fire.."

As for the "Travel Agent" case - congratulations - you had a 50/50 chance and you called it right. Did you get an orgasm on conviction ?

:violent1:

[Brad the Impala]

There was no mention whatsoever of this guy being gay. Only that he claimed to have sex with a 14 year old boy. That would make him a p***** not gay.

What a crock of shit.

Maybe he once shagged an 18 yo what would that make him?



This forum seems to just float on occasion with those who will find any opportunity to defend and justify pxxophiles, even to the above extent.






Still find it weird that I can have sex with a 16yo boy but I can't buy him a lollipop!

I really don't see the point of your latest post - other than to continue your reprehensible habit of shouting "the P word" at anybody who disagrees with your black&white fundementalist views.

The two quotations above are perfectly reasonable: the first being a response to (what I consider) a questionable assertion by another poster and the second refers to the Age of Consent in the UK being different for straightforward sex (16) and prostitution (18) - a context which, for our own purposes, you deviously edited out of course!

You're obsessive to say the least.

[martin911]

[quote="Brad the Impala":bz3mhzej]...surely just not proven....

What a loathesome creature you are.

I don't know George, I've never met or spoken to George, so I have no vested interest one way or another.

The fact of the matter is that he was found NOT GUILTY, after a very lengthy trial without a jury.

So unless you know something that the Thai Police and the Thai Courts don't know, then I suggest you shut your hole.

You are the sort of person that would have hammered the last nail into Jesus Christ , whilst declaring "..there's no smoke without fire.."

As for the "Travel Agent" case - congratulations - you had a 50/50 chance and you called it right. Did you get an orgasm on conviction ?

:violent1:[/quote:bz3mhzej]

I would have to agree with the above --
I dont know this George person at all but why would somebody want to to be so negative,sorry so Nasty when repling to his opening post in which he posts that he has been vindicated by a court for something that was obs hurtfull to him in the past

Downright Nasty !!!