Can anyone figure out why I am quoted in post #37, but then the reply within post #37 has absolutely nothing to do with my comment ?
Can anyone figure out why I am quoted in post #37, but then the reply within post #37 has absolutely nothing to do with my comment ?
The pic I posted were straight boys working in a gay bar, and they are not twinks.Originally Posted by goji
Right, now I understand.
Returning to the original question, if they look like twinks and are straight but willing to indulge in gay sex, they easily meet my personal definition of a twink. Whether correct or not.
Reply With Quote
