Today's Bangkok MRT trivia question

[sglad]

You can throw shit only a few times, after that, it doesn't stick any more (figuratively speaking). Why would a troll waste a try with something that simple to verify/falsify. I wonder that nobody checked before me. A troll would use claims that are not easy to verify (like being of certain nationality and age, or having a disability).

Hi. Firstly, I would like to clear something up. I wasn't calling Christian a troll in the post that Surfcrest referenced above. What I meant was/is that when we turn against each other instead of identifying the trolling activity/behaviour, the troll master would have succeeded in his objectives. Actually, we shouldn't even bother with identifying/discussing the trolling behaviour - the smartest thing to do is to ignore it - but I'm going to contradict myself for a few minutes by discussing it so please bear with me.

Which brings me to Christian's post above. I guess you're talking about my identity. As I've said before, you can choose to believe me, or not. You needn't go any further than that. As for cdnmatt, I don't know and don't care. See how easy it is to ignore something?

Back to the so-called quiz. The fact that you got up from your chair, got dressed, left your house, spent money!!!, and headed to the MRT station to participate in this silly quiz means that you have provided the troll master with multiple orgasms. It's not the veracity of the content or the actual question or about wasting the number of tries - all that doesn't matter - it's about provoking you into a reaction and you did so splendidly. Not only that, you came back here and reported your findings. The troll master must have had to use up another roll of toilet paper to clean himself up!

I'm not so sure that lessons will be learned from this experience (I'm referring to your "you can only throw shit a few times" remark). I mean how long has this been going on? To extend the shit metaphor, when the shit hits the fan, all the troll master has to do is lie low for a while before resurfacing after some time with an an even more outrageous provocation and, as long as somebody responds, the "fun and games" will continue. That's all I'm going to say on this matter as I feel the troll master has been fed enough. No offence intended, Christian.

[christianpfc]

Back to the so-called quiz. The fact that you got up from your chair, got dressed, left your house, spent money!!!, and headed to the MRT station to participate in this silly quiz means that you have provided the troll master with multiple orgasms. It's not the veracity of the content or the actual question or about wasting the number of tries - all that doesn't matter - it's about provoking you into a reaction and you did so splendidly. Not only that, you came back here and reported your findings. The troll master must have had to use up another roll of toilet paper to clean himself up!

I passed there anyway. All I did was riding the lift (up, down, up again) instead of taking the escalator. Apart from that I agree that this must be every troll's wet dream to incite a physical reaction (most responses are just verbal outrage).

frequent's troll status in my books:
+1 for inability to specify where exactly this announcement is made
-1 for correctly naming the change (self storage boxes)
sum 0 which means "unclear status"

He now joins cdnmatt and latintopxxx and sglad on my troll watch list (members whose posts I read under the premise that everything they write might be a figment of their imagination, paying notice if there are any factual errors). Everyone on my troll watch list is welcome to suggest a place and time for meeting to get off that list.

[frequent]

frequent's troll status in my books:
+1 for inability to specify where exactly this announcement is made

So my statement "Between the overhead walkway and the concourse ... on the way up - no apology. On the way down (but I think only if you call the lift up from the concourse) - apology" is insufficiently unambiguous for you?

I suggest you stick to blogging about your failures with Thai boys

[christianpfc]

So my statement "Between the overhead walkway and the concourse ... on the way up - no apology. On the way down (but I think only if you call the lift up from the concourse) - apology" is insufficiently unambiguous for you?

I have to admit I was confused as I don't use these words myself and rarely encounter them (overhead walkway and concourse), however when riding the lift it became clear you mean what's labelled as 2 and B1 in the lift. But there was no such announcement! And I called the lift up from concourse (B1).